Sunday, February 28, 2016

The Night of the Little Gold Man (Liveblog)

In past years I have tended to watch the Academy Awards together with my parents and sometimes my siblings. But especially since it is much later and more awkward to fit with a working schedule (well, not mine, but still . . .) in a European time zone than in the Pacific Standard one, I am stuck following it alone on the internet. So I thought it would be amusing to 'liveblog' it this time, so that no inane observation goes to waste!

1:28 a.m. A rather nice red carpet interview with George Miller, who directed Mad Max: Fury Road. I haven't watched it, though it has been so much praised; but my siblings did, and liked it. The interviewer observed that the original film in the Mad Max series had been shot with a small budget, and that it would not go far nowadays. Budget-wise, Miller said, even arriving in Namibia with the crew and equipment — I think my sister told me that it had been too rainy in Australia to film Mad Max there — would have already taken the $200,000 that were used for the first film. The director was clearly pleased by the question, and ruminated as precisely as he could (with the din and turmoil of the red carpet swelling around him) about the changes in filmmaking in general - smaller cameras are being used now, far more film being shot and then cut by the editors. And, in Mad Max, one of the editors was Mr. Miller's wife.

1:34 a.m. Interviewer's standard question, fired at Saoirse Ronan and Henry Cavill: 'Do you like Germany?' Why I'm watching this: to cringe with second-hand embarrassment.

1:41 a.m. Sacha Baron Cohen was asked The Germany Question again, although thankfully the interviewer had additional questions in reserve. But we learned that he likes the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, for undisclosed reasons; it wasn't a total waste of time.

1:47 a.m. Interviewer speculates about Emily Blunt's pregnancy. Another wave of embarrassment . . .

1:50 a.m. Charlize Theron hurries up the carpet; the interviewer and her associate speculate that the American television network ABC has 'first dibs' on the most important celebrities. They hope that she will return to the phalanx of reporters from other networks later. 'Fingers crossed,' says the interviewer, crossing her fingers literally, with her middle finger straight in the air. Accidental or not, nobody knows.

1:55 a.m. An interview about Jared Leto's shoes, made by Alessandro Michele of Gucci. 'So, did you fall in love with them right away?' . . .

2:06 a.m. An ABC interview with Leonardo DiCaprio. If I didn't have an irrational dislike for him, born of the Titanic years and never shed, I'm sure I'd be enjoying this more . . .

2:11 a.m. In the advertising break (one of many) I am returning to a cowboy book (The Trail Horde, by Charles Alden Seltzer):
Lawler smiled. "I had an agreement with Jim Lefingwell. We made it early last spring."

"A written agreement?"

"Shucks—no. I never had a written agreement with Lefingwell. Never had to. Jim's word was all I ever wanted from him—all I ever asked for."
2:37 a.m. Chris Rock's opening monologue: I guess his argument is that an Oscar nomination isn't a civil right . . . Now he's diagnosing the low-level type of racism that does exist in Hollywood. And saying, "We want opportunity," to relatively un-awkward applause.

2:53 a.m. The Best Adapted Screenplay award is for The Big Short. I guess it was fairly innovative. It did seem like a film I might watch. (Especially since I'm mildly interested in economics and the financial crisis.) To decrease the influence of finance on politics, 'Don't vote for people who take money from weirdo billionaires,' exhorts a writer in his acceptance speech, amongst other things. He probably isn't voting Republican or for Hillary Clinton, since things like her speech at Goldman Sachs have been so contentious recently.

3:15 a.m. After the Best Supporting Actress award, another interlude.
Man and horse were big, capable, strong-willed. They were equipped for life in the grim, wild country that surrounded them. From the slender, powerful limbs of the big bay, to the cartridge-studded belt that encircled the man's middle, with a heavy pistol at the right hip, they seemed to typify the ruggedness of the country, seemed to embody the spirit of the Wild.
3:39 a.m. The cinematographer for The Revenant thanks his compadre, Alejandro Iñarritu. Donald Trump must be grumbling right now.

4:01 a.m. Back to social justice: Here is the Economist's article from a statistical perspective about racial underrepresentation at the Oscars between 2007 and 2013: "How racially skewed are the Oscars?". It looks as if Latino Americans were particularly poorly recognized, and so are Asian Americans. But the article points a finger at casting practices and at drama schools with imbalanced pupils and not even at the Academy in particular.

A further excerpt:
"Blacks really are much more under-represented in the director’s chair, where they account for 6% of directors of the top 600 films, according to the Annenberg study. Black women are nearly nonexistent there (two of the 600, Ms DuVernay being one)."
4:16 a.m. I, for one, could not imagine playing the violin sitting in a chair wearing a black frock above knee height, with a black choker around my neck, but apparently for Oscars music performances, sacrifices must be made.

4:32 a.m. Mark Rylance (of Wolf Hall) wins for acting as a Soviet spy in Bridge of Spies. I'm quite surprised.

5:00 a.m. The Death Montage.

5:50 a.m. Brie Larson is Best Actress for The Room, and Alejandro Iñarritu is Best Director for The Revenant, but I have not much to say . . .

5:59 a.m. Leonardo DiCaprio has his Oscar. I may have to retreat from civilization to places where objectionable people don't get Oscars. :c)

6:00 a.m. Morgan Freeman's Best Picture award presentation is comforting me a little. His voice really is incredible. Spotlight wins. As one of the producers(?) says, three cheers for investigative journalism (which is one of the subjects of the film).

6:03 a.m. Chris Rock: "I want to invite everyone here to the BET Awards this summer!" and "Black Lives Matter!"

The End

Saturday, January 23, 2016

Acting and Being

Although we don't receive French television channels anymore, I realized that it might be worth seeing if YouTube has any of their old programmes. So this evening I was watching a TV5 Monde interview with a Belgian filmmaker about his new meditation — of sorts — about Acting. In it there was an excerpt from the film with what I thought was a fascinatingly straightforward and modest characterization of an actor's hold on an audience.

(Je veux être actrice. In it a ten-year-old girl, who wants to enter the world of acting, listens to philosophies of the field from a series of well-seasoned — and, rather amusingly, apparently all male — actors.)

At any rate, an actor* asks: If someone put a dog on a stage, and then placed the greatest actor in the world beside the animal . . . which one would the audience look at? It's a rhetorical question.
Ils regardent le chien. Parce que le chien: il est. Il est dans son être, il est innocent. Il sait pas qu'on regarde. Alors il se comporte comme s'il était dans sa niche. [Peut-être il?] regarde les gens. Mais, tu vois, il n'est pas en train de fabriquer quelque chose. Ça, c'est très important.
It reminded me greatly of the Drama class I had in school. There a main obstacle to acting well seemed to be that acting naturally comes much harder than acting theatrically and imitating tropes that we've seen elsewhere, on television or wherever. But the effect of acting theatrically is generally so hair-raisingly bad that one is forced into trying something else and hoping to improve. (And if I hadn't acted so lousily myself — to be fair, having been a fine actor might have made the field fascinating too — I don't think it would have fascinated me as much as it does.) Of course I think one might be very theatrical without acting badly or artificially, if one has the temperament and taste to carry it off; but perhaps the aim is really to find one's 'niche.'

Another reason why it interested me, too, at this time, was because I've read a little of Charlotte Rampling's remarks about Oscar nominations. It's not entirely relevant, but I was wondering why she believes that Oscar nominations are an index of fine acting instead of a snapshot of moviegoers' tastes — even if those moviegoers are Hollywood professionals. There have been enough venerable compeers (and critics) who have thumbed their noses at the awards, because they didn't find them very meaningful as a measure of personal talent or effort. If acting is being, of course it is difficult, even if one is an evenhanded critic and has managed to find a handful of the genuinely 'best' actors in a particular cinematic year, to reward some of these for being better than the next actor. In a similar train of thought, perhaps, Alan Rickman once said that roles and not actors are rewarded. (Or maybe he was tilting at the scant complexity of the public's tastes.) **

From: "Un nouveau film du cinéaste belge entre fiction et réalité." (YouTube: TV5MONDE.) January 20, 2016.

* I think he's Denis Podalydès.
** "Parts win prizes, not actors." From "11 of Alan Rickman's best quotes," (Entertainment Weekly) By Mary Sollosi. January 14, 2016.

Tuesday, December 29, 2015

Merry Christmas

A gingerbread facsimile of the Jama Masjid in Delhi, India. (December 16, 2015)
Omama's Advent calendar, c. 1987, is in the background.

Friday, November 27, 2015

Thoreau in His Winter Walk

(If I wrote this post perfectly, I'd never get it done. So I hope that there are no mistakes, and that the rather random choice of picking pieces of Byron's verse to offer the contrast to Thoreau is not too bothersome!)

There are few essays that have delighted me so greatly that I will think of them again years afterward and look forward to recommending them to others — but Henry David Thoreau's "Winter Walk," an essay that describes a day after heavy snow in his New England habitat, is the rarity that lives up to this unexpected bliss. (It is not to be confused with Walking, which is a general essay about sauntering, etc.)

I don't know if philosophical meaning is the aim of the essay, aside maybe from the usual tension between nature and man that I doubt Thoreau meant to address here. (Even when the trees, birds, etc., are resting, the chimneys of his neighbours send up their flags into the air, doubtless emanating the ghosts of lumbered trees.) At the end of it, I think we might be left, too — for instance — with the illusion that a theoretical appreciation of nature is an enrichment to the world at large. In practical terms, of course, the illusion might not be easy to 'prove'; but perhaps Thoreau and his neighbours were indeed stewards rather than robber barons of their lands. Later, of course, since a few plums of morality are still dropped in the pudding of this essay in the final paragraphs; and I think in the end he has virtually adopted a kind of Socratic method whereby a dialogue between nature and man has taken place during the walk, leading to some kind of conclusion that the questioner had held all along; I will mention what 'lessons' there are in the text.

There are implicit 'themes' in Thoreau's approach: in a way Thoreau is a 'socialist' about nature-worship in this essay. Ignoring the fact that he is depicting a solitary protagonist walking, as (after all) this protagonist meets others along the way, he seems firmly convinced that any man can feel the same things on this journey. It makes no difference whether they are Transcendentalist Philosophers or street sweepers — even the pickerel-fishermen whom he depicts as numbed, physically if not mentally, by their freezing wintry sentry-posts. (In that respect he is widely different from Lord Byron's Childe Harold,* for instance, for whom the remainder of humanity seems rather an unappreciative nuisance on the face of nature. I think that other writers can — though at the moment I can't mention other examples — be aristocratic about the level of intellectual or emotional refinement needed before Nature deigns to 'reveal herself' to the observer.)

Julien Alden Weir, "The Ice Cutters"
1895; Oil on canvas; via Wikimedia Commons

WHEN walking and watching things, without external distractions (at least) and — due to the snow — left with nowhere else to be, perhaps we can evolve our own philosophies quite naturally; and Thoreau is merely here to show us the way, like a signpost. In that sense his text is undemanding. Of course it isn't strictly observation, since he describes things we wouldn't see on a walk — "The meadow mouse has slept in his snug gallery in the sod, the owl has sat in a hollow tree in the depth of the swamp, the rabbit, the squirrel, and the fox have all been housed." — but like to imagine, anthropomorphically. (Like — to put it unpatronizingly, since after all more grown-up animal illustrations like the Capitalist Pig are also the fruits of imagination — in children's books.)

***

Of course 'Nature' is a mirror of sorts, to ourselves and our human environments, when we write about it like this. When Byron, for instance, writes of

"The fall of waters! rapid as the light
The flashing mass foams shaking the abyss;
The hell of waters! where they howl and hiss,
And boil in endless torture; while the sweat
Of their great agony, wrung out from this
Their Phlegethon, curls round the rocks of jet
That gird the gulf around, in pitiless horror set,"

I gather that not every visitor of the waterfalls will have seen the same degree of terror in his subject; and even there, there is a contrast to Byron's own Weltanschauung (if Childe Harold is his alter ego in this aspect too) as a child. It's particularly clear at the end of Canto IV: he writes of the ocean, not a waterfall, in fearsome terms. Then he surprisingly drops in a childhood scene that in tone almost fits in Stevenson's Garden of Verses:

"And I have loved thee, Ocean! and my joy
Of youthful sports was on thy breast to be
Borne like thy bubbles, onward: from a boy
I wantoned with thy breakers—they to me
Were a delight; and if the freshening sea
Made them a terror—'twas a pleasing fear."

Many might have looked at Thoreau's tranquil snows and unearthed or imagined a substratum of horror, benign though it might have looked to Thoreau; but it's also Thoreau's selection of nature to look at which reveals something about him as a human being.

Thoreau's watercourses are not at all like Byron's; they're malice-free metaphors of latent life and energy.

Occasionally we wade through fields of snow, under whose depths the river is lost for many rods, to appear again to the right or left, where we least expected; still holding on its way underneath, with a faint, stertorous, rumbling sound, as if, like the bear and marmot, it too had hibernated, and we had followed its faint summer trail to where it earthed itself in snow and ice. At first we should have thought that rivers would be empty and dry in midwinter, or else frozen solid till the spring thawed them; but their volume is not diminished even, for only a superficial cold bridges their surfaces. The thousand springs which feed the lakes and streams are flowing still. The issues of a few surface springs only are closed, and they go to swell the deep reservoirs. Nature's wells are below the frost. The summer brooks are not filled with snow-water, nor does the mower quench his thirst with that alone. The streams are swollen when the snow melts in the spring, because nature's work has been delayed, the water being turned into ice and snow, whose particles are less smooth and round, and do not find their level so soon.

***

While it doesn't seem like any thundering waterfalls were threshing through Walden Pond, so Thoreau wouldn't have described them anyway, I think that clearly everyone is more comfortable in some phases of nature than in others. And, if I remember correctly, Thoreau himself had little use for the cedar, spruce and fir forests of the far West.

*

At any rate, Thoreau acts like a pacesetter as well as like a 'signpost.' He renders each scene he finds or imagines so roundly before he progresses to the next, that it is practically impossible not to read the text whilst 'slowing down' a little, too. I like mentally laying excerpts of the text side by side with my early memories of waking up on a snowy day — which were special events to me particularly since they were rare in our warmer corner of Canada. In that respect, reading "The Winter Walk" is like curling into a window-seat and looking through the pane every now and then to find a sight that verifies and illustrates one's text.  This makes the reading a little longer and nicer, and furnishes time needed for things to sink in. Of course Thoreau knowingly draws the reader into his journey; he writes it in the first person plural and the present tense.

And Thoreau's neutral way of not preachingly proving anything — not even necessarily proving Thoreau's way with words or thoughtfulness, because a perceptible drip of self-regard would shatter the atmosphere like a smidgen of meltwater the surface of a pond — makes this essay an easy Philosophy to read. (Walking has a divergent aim, and a glance at it shows that it is far more filled with didacticism and literary references.) At the end of the "Winter Walk," of course, he can't resist:
In winter we lead a more inward life. Our hearts are warm and cheery, like cottages under drifts, whose windows and doors are half concealed, but from whose chimneys the smoke cheerfully ascends. The imprisoning drifts increase the sense of comfort which the house affords, and in the coldest days we are content to sit over the hearth and see the sky through the chimney-top, enjoying the quiet and serene life that may be had in a warm corner by the chimney-side, or feeling our pulse by listening to the low of cattle in the street, or the sound of the flail in distant barns all the long afternoon. No doubt a skillful physician could determine our health by observing how these simple and natural sounds affected us. We enjoy now, not an Oriental, but a Boreal leisure, around warm stoves and fireplaces, and watch the shadow of motes in the sunbeams.
Perhaps, too, this essay is the pleasanter for not being about the manmade environment. Without thinking that the world is beautiful only "Though every prospect pleases, and only man is vile," there is nothing in the essay that requires criticism or roused moral outrage. And that freedom from irritation is also one reason to celebrate Christmas; at least if one gives everyone else some respite from reasons to distrust human nature. — Thoreau: "Now commences the long winter evening around the farmer's hearth, when the thoughts of the indwellers travel far abroad, and men are by nature and necessity charitable and liberal to all creatures. Now is the happy resistance to cold, when the farmer reaps his reward, and thinks of his preparedness for winter, and, through the glittering panes, sees with equanimity 'the mansion of the northern bear,' for now the storm is over," [...].

At any rate, I think the inspirations here are brilliant. At the beginning, for instance: "[I]nward warmth, a divine cheer and fellowship" is a Victorian-era phrase that I would be tempted to skim over. But it's merely part of a variable and either tangible or esoteric series of thoughts. And oddly enough it is coherent. Ceres, the product of the Greek Mediterranean and summery symbol of fertility, is an interesting inspiration; and in 18th-century poets I have found it terribly distracting to keep track of all the references to nymphs, hills, and hunters; but when Thoreau writes, "But while the earth has slumbered, all the air has been alive with feathery flakes descending, as if some northern Ceres reigned, showering her silvery grain over all the fields," I am not taken out of the atmosphere at all, nor driven to a Dictionary of Mythology for footnotes. These are piffling examples, of course.

In fact the biggest 'vexation' I have had in writing about the "Winter Walk" is narrowing down the handful of quotations that I want to share. This, for example — "The recent tracks of the fox or otter, in the yard, remind us that each hour of the night is crowded with events, and the primeval nature is still working and making tracks in the snow." It expresses exactly what everyone, I think, feels when they wake up and see the mysterious trails and traces of different animals outside. Or this lovely description of a merely half-veiled world underneath the glassy river ice:
With one impulse we are carried to the cabin of the muskrat, that earliest settler, and see him dart away under the transparent ice, like a furred fish, to his hole in the bank; and we glide rapidly over meadows where lately "the mower whet his scythe," through beds of frozen cranberries mixed with meadow-grass. 
"First Snow Along the Hudson River" (1859)
by François Régis Gignoux
via Wikimedia Commons

A warming acknowledgement in his "Winter Walk," too, is not that life still statically exists in winter; but that rather life is developing, and that there is a purpose and continuity to it:

In winter, nature is a cabinet of curiosities, full of dried specimens, in their natural order and position. The meadows and forests are a hortus siccus. The leaves and grasses stand perfectly pressed by the air without screw or gum, and the birds' nests are not hung on an artificial twig, but where they builded them. We go about dry-shod to inspect the summer's work in the rank swamp, and see what a growth have got the alders, the willows, and the maples; testifying to how many warm suns, and fertilizing dews and showers. See what strides their boughs took in the luxuriant summer,—and anon these dormant buds will carry them onward and upward another span into the heavens.

Lastly, I think that the "Winter Walk" is also so charming because it renders the sense of safety that we feel in winter when we are lucky, and we are sheltered from wind, rain, snow and frost; fed and warmed. — It may be a trite thought; art and music and even commerce in the Christmas phase of winter are all adjusted to create precisely this feeling. — And still, of course, winter might be terribly lonesome and Hadean if so many other beings, human or not, weren't triumphantly doing exactly the same thing beyond our walls.


*
The surly night-wind rustles through the wood, and warns us to retrace our steps, while the sun goes down behind the thickening storm, and birds seek their roosts, and cattle their stalls.
***

Sources:
Winter Walk, in Excursions and Poems at Project Gutenberg.
Walking, also at Project Gutenberg.

1 Though every prospect pleases - Quotation from Reginald Heber's "From Greenland's Icy Mountains.", at Wikiquote
2 The fall of waters! - Quotation from Lord Byron's Childe Harold's Pilgrimage, Canto IV Stanza LXIX, p. 128, from an 1886 edition at Archive.org.)
3 And I have loved thee! Quotation ibid., p. 162. Canto IV, Stanza CLXXXIV.)

All other quotations, of course, from Thoreau's Winter Walk. (Here in the volume Excursions and Poems at Project Gutenberg.)
***
* "Ten thousand fleets sweep over thee in vain." To be fair, Byron also insists, "I love not Man the less, but Nature more," when he communes with Nature.

The rest (Canto IV, Stanza 177) is — I think — partly serene and beautiful . . .
There is a pleasure in the pathless woods, There is a rapture on the lonely shore, There is society, where none intrudes, By the deep Sea, and music in its roar;
But he does depict Man as an antagonist, 'Though every prospect pleases':
Man marks the earth with ruin
(Stanza 178.)

J.E.H. MacDonald, "Morning after Snow, High Park"
Oil on canvas, 1912; via Wikimedia Commons

Friday, October 09, 2015

Refugees and a Reckless Driver

Yesterday, after waking up in the early afternoon, I had an errand in Moabit — a quarter of Berlin that is a little north of Mitte, or the city centre. Generally I go there through the S- and U-Bahn station Zoologischer Garten, which is to say the sprawling commuter node at the edge of the Berlin Zoological Gardens, itself in the left bottom corner of the sprawling central park of the Tiergarten. This time I was running late, so instead of taking the buses and risking the delays inherent in the heavy traffic, I walked as briskly as I could; it took 37 minutes to reach the U9 U-Bahn line platform.

THE errand was by the campus of the Landesamt for Gesundheit und Soziales, or the Berlin state office for Health and Social Welfare. It is a heterogeneous mixture of ancient brick buildings, parking niches, low mid-20th century edifices that have an ad-hoc air much like the prefabricated 'portables' in which my siblings and I had our classes when the school buildings weren't large enough for all of the students, and landscaping with shrubs and a park full of loosely planted trees that shade it but that also permit the light to reach the grass freely. The asylum seekers — who are registered and then distributed to housing in the rest of Germany or to the communes of Berlin there — were either gathered under overhanging first floors of buildings, or the awning of a restaurant or bar, or streaming about in leather jackets, rain jackets or transparent rain ponchos.

Lately the 'LaGeSo' has frequently appeared in the Berlin evening news. Firstly, because it is a main setting in Berlin's share in the refugee crisis. But, secondly, because it reports the inevitable irregularities in the government's handling of the refugees. One such irregularity: in order to be distributed, the refugees are asked to come to the campus on a certain day. Then they have to wait until their call numbers appear on a digital signboard — outside the building. There is no shelter or warmth to shield them from the rain and from the cold, which is expected to set in over the weekend, with the first 0° temperature at nighttime. Lastly, there is a safety issue — for example, a child seems to have been kidnapped from the campus.

At any rate, yesterday, at House R. a handful of volunteers — freelance volunteers as well as practiced volunteers from the neighbourhood group Moabit hilft, I think; but the Johanniter and other organizations as well as the Landesamt itself* are on the campus, too — was huddling in the roofed porch. At the foot of the entrance path, there was a thin barricade of benches and red-and-white tape. On the other side of a barricade, a handful of people in rain ponchos (asylum-seekers, I guessed) was wordlessly standing as if waiting to be let in. 'We have nothing for you here,' said one of the volunteers loudly. I thought it was a rather poignant scene.

(*Also, the medical personnel that volunteers through the Ärztekammer. I still haven't quite understood who the green-jacketed people are who seem to be in charge of the campus — they also stand at the entrance to the campus, for example, in pairs, and seem to offer low-level security.)

Later there was a happier touching scene. A small boy and — I think — his brother, were walking together across a little lawn. His rain poncho reached his feet, overlong, and it had a neat gnomey peak on his head; and altogether the stumpy figure was rather like a pre-schooler in costume as a ghost for Halloween. I almost had to repress tears of emotion at how cute he was, and at how nicely he and his brother seemed to get along; and then thought that I am getting sentimental in my advanced age.

*

I entered the bus east of the U-Bahn station Turmstraße, and then left it after an entertaining ride — made entertaining by the 'colour commentary' of the driver — and walked from the Ernst-Reuter-Platz on the way back.

Indicating (one of) the reason(s) for the traffic congestion, I passed the barricades that are securing the Straße des 17. Juni. There will be a mass demonstration against the trade agreements TTIP* and CETA. As far as pedestrians went, while the square at Zoologischer Garten, as well as the Wittenbergplatz, were teeming, rain and all, the Siegessäule (Victory Column) in the Tiergarten park was fairly abandoned.

It was tranquil in parts of the Hofjägerallee, too, amongst the acorns and the fallen chestnuts, the underbrush, the older oaks and plane trees, the setts, rain dripping and dropping into a half-overgrown ditch, and the sand of Berlin. Many birds, it appeared, have migrated south of Berlin — or perhaps were taking shelter. Just the grey-and-black 'storm crows' were neither perturbed by wind nor rain.

In the lesser streets, at any rate, the road traffic scarcely improved. As I was walking along the sidewalk, I had almost reached an intersection, when a car ramped up on the sidewalk right behind me and rode along the middle of it a few metres to reach a driveway. It was like Grand Theft Auto, or a miniature Hollywood thriller.

* TTIP = Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (United States - European Union)
CETA = Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (Canada - EU)


Thursday, August 27, 2015

What's for Dinner

'Penne Bolognese.' The ingredients were,

1.5 Slender sausages
1 Clove garlic
3.5 Onions
5 Celery stalks
6 Mushrooms
3 Dabs of tomato paste
2 Tins Tomatoes, in juice
1 Box of diced tomato pieces
1 Vine tomato, fresh
1 kg? of Ground beef
1 Bay leaf
Enough hot water with beef bouillon powder to rinse out the tomato receptacles
Dried basil and oregano and rosemary, ground pepper, salt, and sweet paprika
1 kg of penne
N.B.: We only needed 0.5 kg.

As I had feared, after an experience cooking a bacon-laden formal bolognese sauce recipe years ago, the porky sausage flavour 'outshouted' the beef. (Much like the fragrance of a pig farm overwhelms the ambient countryside, albeit far more agreeably.) It was not bad, although I think that beef that tastes like pork has a Frankenstein's-monster-like quality; the meaty flavour of the sausages was pleasingly savoury and tempting. In fact, if I had just made lentil soup or made a fried meal of the sausages, onions and mushrooms, it would have done them justice.

But, as far as taste went, the tomatoes turned into a dominant paradox. Though I theoretically believe in making the frying fat from the beginning of a recipe absorb and carry the flavour, and I mixed the tomatoes and other ingredients well, they were watery-tasting tomatoes. I even let the bottom of the onions, garlic, celery, sausage and ground meat burn, thereby having caramelization and the Maillard reaction increase the flavour, and it made no apparent difference. The perfidious tomatoes — again, having little flavour in themselves — dominated everything except their own wateriness.

So my experiments with bolognese sauce — after a lengthy and frustrating history of watery-tasting sauces — are not yet completed.

Saturday, August 01, 2015

Cordoba and Current Affairs

Earlier today, I came across a livestreamed discussion panel from the Teatro Colón in Argentina. Normally, of course, the theatre would play host to classical music concerts, and this evening Daniel Barenboim was discussing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict alongside four others. There were Daniel Goldman, Guillermo Marco and Omar Abboud — religious leaders in Argentina as per Barenboim's Facebook page; and the fourth was Felipe González Márquez, former president of Spain. The moderator was Hugo Sigman, who (says an online encyclopaedia) is the CEO of pharmaceutical and chemical companies in Argentina.

González approached the Israel-Palestinian issue by referring to the caliphate of Córdoba in the 12th century and drawing comparisons to the present. He offered that tolerance is less than perfect if it means arrogantly ignoring the Other and failing to understand him. He talked of the risk that the decline of Córdoba could recur in the present day, but I couldn't understand who would be the Isabella in this new scenario. Historically of course the multiculturalism of Moorish Spain ended in the Reconquista* by a fanatical contingent of Catholics. The allusions to Averroës, Aristotle, Maimonides, etc. went a little beyond my frame of reference.

I was wary that he would start talking about how bleeding-heart liberalism bares us to the risk of underestimating the true fanatical darkness of Muslims. This pessimism is perhaps a severe side-effect of hearing the American political debate too much. Maybe if I understood the finer shadings of his comparison of the past with the present, without the barriers of language, I wouldn't have been so worried.

Next Sigman asked Daniel Barenboim a question, which was if I remember correctly about the key moment as a child or a young man that made the Israeli-Palestinian conflict so important to him. He quickly despatched that with a description of himself as an apolitical child largely interested by 1) music and 2) soccer. Then he argued that the crux of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not a political conflict, whether over water rights or land or borders or any such cause. Instead it is a failure of human interaction, in which neither party is ready at all to try to understand (even without needing to agree with the thoughts of) the other. Nor do they feel the first curiosity to do so.**

If I understood correctly, he added that ideas like Pope Francis's were needed. I.e. that of asking leaders from both sides to the Vatican City to pray together, as the Pope did when he visited the Middle East recently. The leaders would meet as persons and at least in that sphere practice coexistence (convivencia; but maybe 'conviviality' is too agreeable a translation). Abstract in a way the gesture might be, too. But other ways to address the problem haven't worked beautifully well; and using the spiritual or the human element might be an effective novel approach.

The other three panellists, I'm afraid, I mostly ignored. (I was playing a computer game at the time.)

(Therefore I'm not sure how great a documentary value this blog post will have. But I thought that at least it might contain a few references to worthwhile things.)


*I once read an article in the New Yorker which describes quite well that all was not fine in Andalusian Spain before Felipe and Isabella arrived on the scene, which also explains the gap between the 12th century and the 15th in this narrative. It is a review of a book by Bernard Lewis, against whose post-2001 leanings I had a grudge whose reasons I have repressed. So at any rate I'll offer a warning that maybe the article isn't completely as nice as I remember it. ("A Better Place," by Joan Acocella.(?) February 4, 2008 issue.)

** Daniel Barenboim's ideas, verbatim, are also replicated in this article in the Guardian from 2008: "Bridging the Gap, part two," by Ed Vulliamy.

Thursday, July 02, 2015

The Thriller of the Pumpkin Stem

"Secret Agent Jones": A fragment from 2007. When I came across it yesterday, I thought it was so endearingly dumb that I might as well share it, in a slightly emended form.

Secret Agent Jones was the consummate man of mystery. He had a smiling round face, a cheery and open manner, and a small stature, but in his pockets was always the cold steel of a revolver, and he did not work in a store or in an office nor yet in any other conventional business but – in the British Secret Service.

He had been with the government agency for decades. Such had his service been, that his employers had granted him the prestigious License to Bill, which permits the bearer to charge MI6 for extravagant costs incurred during his work on behalf of the government – even hotel room service, up to the sum of 100 pounds.

Jones — after being kicked out of Britain's finest institutes of higher learning, one by one, (beginning with Eton) —, entered MI6 to help one of his friends. This friend, it turned out, was in the pay of the Russians. When one day Jones inadvertently shredded the wrong letter, and humbly took a document that left no doubt of his friend's iniquity to a vigilant superior, he became a hero and rapidly rose in the ranks. His friendliness and charm helped him along the way, as did his wise habit of saying as little as possible, which much magnified the appearance of his intellect. 

So, one day, he found himself on a yacht with other luminaries. His face was unusually red because his tie (MI6 issue) was much too tight for him, having been prepared in Bond Street according to the measures given in a dusty old folder from the eighties. But he was glossy and neat and dark as the feast required, and he had put on sunglasses to lend him a modern chic. He fit in perfectly to the glittering crowd.

On Hallowe'en, just a month before, a jovial office party had taken place at MI6 headquarters in the heart of London. In the darkness an enormous pumpkin had sidled up to Secret Agent Jones, who was dressed as a bat. The pumpkin pretended to trip on one of Jones's great dark brown wings (a refurbished curtain with black pipe cleaners stuck onto it). Jones courteously lifted the pumpkin back up by the stem. In the stem there was a piece of paper. Jones took it; then the pumpkin whispered into his ears (which were greatly enlarged and tipped with great tufts of black bat fur) to read the paper carefully, then to destroy it by popping it into one of the jack-o-lanterns.  The secret agent flapped into the bathroom and read the following:

Wednesday, May 13, 2015

A Third Round of Grammar

From the First Book in English Grammar by George Payn Quackenbos (1868).

p. 66

EXERCISE.
       Parse all the words:—If I were you, I would be a better girl.—Try [agrees with its subject you understood] to do your duty.—Blessed be the peace-makers.—Love all men, hate none.—To steal is base.—To tell the truth, if you were to fail, I should be glad.—Take care lest thou go astray.—What care I whether thou stay or go?
***

THIS is my attempt to "parse" the first sentence, with a format like the one that the First Book in English Grammar's writer has set forth:

*

I, simple personal pronoun, first person, singular number, masculine or feminine gender, nominative case, the subject of the verb were.
If I were, intransitive verb, subjunctive mood, imperfect tense, first person, singular number, and it agrees with the subject I.
You, simple personal pronoun, second person, plural number [in those days], masculine or feminine gender, nominative case, the subject of the verb were.
(— Rule, (from p. 34), "A verb that has no object takes the same case after as before it, when both words refer to the same person or thing.")
I, ditto; the subject of the verb would be.
would be, intransitive verb, potential mood, imperfect tense, first person, singular number, and it agrees with the subject I.
a, indefinite article, and it relates to girl.
girl, common noun, first person, singular number, feminine gender, nominative case, the subject of the verb would be. (Rule above.)
better, common adjective; good, better, best; in the comparative degree, and it relates to girl.

*

Finishing the questions is still a little shaky. After I guess the answers, I leaf around in the textbook frequently to verify them. — It brings me back to the Christmas-time King William's College Quiz motto: the better part of knowledge is knowing where to find it. (If that is indeed the motto, remembered correctly.)

Saturday, May 09, 2015

A Second Morsel of Grammar (and Thoughts)


SECOND PERSON.
  
.Singular.Plural.
Nom.Thou,you, ye,
Poss. thy, thine, your, yours,
Obj. thee; you, ye.

I'M FINICKY ABOUT using language properly in professional contexts — newspaper articles and non-self-published works, especially, and there I might even be particular about specifics like using 'data' as the plural form — only the plural form — of 'datum.' ('Professional contexts,' I think, must be stressed, since it would be rude and mean to scrutinize the merest text message of everybody and exclaim "'Tis an illiterate!" at every tiniest flaw, simply since I am personally so fastidious that I even purposely avoid contractions sometimes.)

But it's also grating when high-faluting language, ironically or not, is misused. That's why I think it's important to further the right kind of high-faluting language, and find it helpful to have this table at hand. (Besides, if I write historical tales for amusement, I want to have a scientifically right approach to the language of the time. But I wonder in this case how much the written and vernacular grammar changed from the Middle Ages to the 1860s, when the textbook that I am reading and where I found this grammar table was published. A 15th-century 'thou' might be quite different.)

**


Naturally I make mistakes of ostentatiousness, too; and perhaps there is an unnecessary element of elitism in the claiming of language by the ivory tower, which is also why I think that my education de-emphasized it. (I do still like the idea of thinking of language consciously, in particular contexts.) Thirdly, I think it's often true in my experience that anyone who tries to rectify someone else's orthographical mistakes or grammatical deviations, makes a mistake themselves. Maybe it's a part of Murphy's Law,* or maybe it's instant 'karma.'

Lastly, I think that rules of grammar generally are a half-lost cause, at least for a generation or two. With the retirement of copy-editors and subeditors from the newspaper and publishing industry structures, there may be fewer models of 'proper' language in perpetuity. Although, as I read somewhere, the anarchy of spelling presently can hardly be worse or really different at all from the anarchy that existed in Samuel Johnson's childhood. As I learn about old 'listed buildings' in parts of England, I've read lots of examples of different spellings for the names of towns and people — which might be an archivist's and historian's headache, but tends to be sorted out in the end — and maybe today's similar kind of chaos will be built into a temporary Tower again — if only for reasons of practicality — after all.

*****

Source: First Book in English Grammar, George Payn Quackenbos (1868). At Google Books.

[Revised May 12.] 
Edited to add: * (In fact, it is called 'Muphry's Law,' which I've learned in this comment thread.)

Monday, April 27, 2015

A Grammar Tidbit

Lately I've been hoping to learn formal English grammar to help me in my more formal writing. Now I've strayed upon this piece of information, which I'm liable to forget if it isn't written somewhere where I will see it. (I apologize if it's tedious.)

***

Explanation: "Than" isn't only a preposition. It is also a conjunction. If there are two pairs of subject and verb in a sentence, then clearly it must be separated by one, if not by punctuation. For example (as is written in Wiktionary): 'she is taller than I am.'

It is clear that it is treated differently in that function.

As a conjunction, it takes the nominative case. Again, quoting Wiktionary:

"You are a better swimmer than she."
is right because it is an abbreviation of the phrase,
"You are a better swimmer than she is."

As a preposition, it takes the oblique case. Therefore,

"They like you more than her."
is right because it abbreviates
"They like you more than they like her."

*

(Thank you for your indulgence!)

Sunday, March 15, 2015

Sunday Devotions

After a hiatus since last December, I finally wrote out a line from the Greek New Testament again, and added the King James and Martin Luther versions beneath. If I relied on random passages from the Bible for my emotional and ethical formation, however, I would be a spiritually impoverished individual. For the pearl of wisdom written out today was the following:

For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie.

Monday, February 02, 2015

The Superb Owl (XLIX)

Last night the Super Bowl livestreamed from 0:30 UTC +1. I was fortunately awake anyway, though determined to begin watching at halftime, worried that the game might be frustrating and therefore better watched in moderation. In the end I enjoyed watching it, though I had wanted the Seattle Seahawks to win for no greater reason than that the players were halfway familiar from the last Super Bowl and relatively sympathetic, and that having lived a few kilometres north of Seattle instills a parochial loyalty.

Even if I had paid attention all the time, I am not acquainted with the rules of American football yet, and can't pretend to an informed view on Katy Perry or Lenny Kravitz or Missy Elliot and their performances at halftime, didn't watch any of the advertising except maybe in excerpts afterwards, and missed even the national anthem as sung by Idina Menzel. So there is nothing much worth writing on my part.

STILL, a vignette of fleeting glory —

RUSSELL WILSON (I think), the Seattle Seahawks' quarterback, fires the ball at a teammate — Jermaine Kearse — on the far margin of the Patriots' half. The ball slips into the air from Kearse's fingertips, falls, and skips off his thigh as he himself falls. He tries to trap it with his hands; it glides through the pincers of his arms. It flies off his hand a third time as he twirls — still lying on his back — in a half-circle to trail its trajectory. Finally, he cups it safely in his hands as if it were a holy grail and he a Knight of the Round Table.*

The first nearby Patriots player has fallen even flatter. Another Patriot is trying to rise far away from the Seahawk's head. I think that announcers at the time said that the Patriots were neglecting the ball since they figured that it had already been invalidated. Watching the playbacks I'd say there was little time to think much of anything, and that avoiding a gnarly injury in the melée was rightfully a first consideration. (Which is perhaps why I am not an athlete, or a sports announcer.)

At any rate, the Seahawk sits up again, gets to his feet and gradually runs off the playing field in a tiny tangent. His team can remain in possession of the ball, almost a jump away from the Patriots endzone.

We all know how that ended. But for a shining instant I was really looking forward to another Seahawks touchdown. It would have brought them, as far as I can follow the rules of the game, to a 31-28 lead over the Patriots in pretty much the final minute.

***
Detailed observations from: "Jermaine Kearse's Insane Super Bowl Catch, In Extreme Slow Motion" (Deadspin)

* I was going to write Percival, but I hated Percival after reading his legend (rewritten and abridged) as a child.
N.B.: The 'Superb Owl' anagram is courtesy of Stephen Colbert.

Monday, January 12, 2015

End the Sanctions?

READING in the Monde diplomatique again after a hiatus, I was pleased to find that this magazine's relative mildness since the Ignacio Ramonet era is temporarily banished.

In the last lines of a praise-filled and still tough article on the United States's lifting of the Cuba embargo, for instance —

After quoting the insight that President Obama stated last year — "Moreover, it does not serve America's interests, or the Cuban people, to try to push Cuba toward collapse. Even if that worked -– and it hasn't for 50 years –- we know from hard-earned experience that countries are more likely to enjoy lasting transformation if their people are not subjected to chaos."*—

The White House: "Statement by the President on Cuba Policy Changes" (December 17, 2014)

Mr. Halimi writes,
Il ne reste plus à Washington, Berlin, Londres et Paris qu'à appliquer cette leçon à la Russie. Sans attendre cinquante ans?

(My rough translation: "The only thing left is for Washington, Berlin, London, and Paris to apply this lesson to Russia. Perhaps without waiting fifty years to do it?")

Thursday, December 18, 2014

Vladimir Horowitz and the Frolicsome Muses

They wash their soft skin in the Horses' Spring
Or in Permessus or Olmeius, then
Dance, fair and graceful, on the mountain-top
And whirl their feet about. Then they rise up [...]
From: Hesiod: "Theogony," Dorothea Wender (transl., Penguin 1982)

The Liszt and this passage from Hesiod seem to go together quite beautifully . . . I'm not that fond of Liszt, perhaps unfairly; still, when I heard this piece on television while I was reading this quartet of verse, the two of them melded rather unexpectedly.

(The music itself begins at around 3 minutes and 16 seconds:)

Perspiration, Orange, and Theogony

Yesterday I was so hungry that I went grocery-shopping again. Afterward I baked chicken thighs in the oven, with butter and rosemary and pepper as well as salt and a little artificial seasoning (which both appeared to vanish in the course of the baking); and threw together a salad of chicory, fennel, apple and orange. As for the dressing, I shook in white wine vinegar at first out of panic that the chicory might turn brownish at the edges, then squeezed the juice of half an orange and swirled honey in it; but I have to admit that when I drank the dressing that was left in the dish after the salad was eaten, its taste was hardly tempting.

Lastly, I prepared chestnuts. I had the vague intuition that they might be done after one of them blew apart with a thump — specifically, with a thump that I heard even over the humming computers in the nearby room. I might not even have known what the thump was, if not for a similar mishap with roasting pumpkin seeds that transpired around Hallowe'en.

Saturday, December 13, 2014

An Authorly Memo


For the Spain Story, which is mentioned in the last post, I have read in different avenues, not very intensively. Firstly there was a surface investigation of conservative religion in Spain, especially in the Franco era; then of events in 2007, setting up a timeline that I'll (hopefully) lead into 2008, when the story will happen on the eve of the financial crisis. Helpfully, the figure of the protagonist's father became a little sharper once I read about conservative religious circles, though I still don't know whether to make him more of a monarchist and a Catholic or a Catholic or a Catholic monarchist.

What hampers me a little in the imagining of the antihero's father's upbringing is that I had a fairly mild upbringing, and have no direct idea of the uptight, little-man institutions that might have been de rigueur (literally!) in Spain in the forties or earlier.

 I'll  figure out what the schools were like in Spain, anyway; while it might be irrelevant for the father, I'd thought of sending the main character to a military academy. But that feels wrong, and I can't plunk him into a gymnasium without finding out if Spain had any, first.

Still, in the past week I have been 'resting'; the digestion and application of the notes that I take seems as important as the taking.

Sunday, October 26, 2014

The Green Ayuntamiento and Other Stories

This morning I awoke at nine-thirtyish, and was pleased that the time change made me look like an earlier riser than I was intentionally. It has been chilly lately and the trees are beginning to lose their leaves en masse after being in their original splendour quite far into the season. Of course the plane trees will likely bear their foliage into November as they always do.

Within the past week, smoke has hung in the air, and I saw a chimneystack where the vapour was rapidly drawn forth and dissipated into the breeze. We have not turned on the stoves yet ourselves. Still, last week and for the first time this autumn, I turned on an electric heater to banish the humidity from my room. Generally I've held to the belief — however — that adapting to wintry temperatures is helpful for the immune system, besides its environmental and pecuniary benefits.

During that same week, our uncle brought a pale orange, white-streaked pumpkin from a neighbour's patch in the eastern periphery of Berlin, which sat in state on our kitchen table until I began to use it the day before yesterday. It has yielded pumpkin pies — a Mürbeteig pastry aromatic with lemon juice and zest, and a filling of pumpkin purée and eggs with sugar and spices — and a potful of pumpkin soup which Ge. made. In the process of it, he cut up a massive bowlful of pumpkin sticks which was exhausting even to contemplate, besides dicing the onions, etc.

FROM an eating perspective the weekend has been rather good; during the week, which was busy, I was a little more austere than I'd have liked. Ever since I felt exhausted so often last year, I have been more careful to eat nutrients aplenty.

After the first bit of breakfast, at any rate, I turned to the computer and went to Flickr for story research. It will be a Lousy Story, so I have been arguing with myself if it's fair to invest a great deal of time and energy into it. In the end I guess that it is not in me to waste even lesser ideas. (Though I had thought of writing an Edgar Allan Poe parody recently, which would also be worthwhile depending on my ability to execute it.)

Ayuntamiento de Burgo de Osma, by Edithor after: photograph by Z. Sánchez.
Oct. 26th, 2014. Original size: 4.7 x 5 cm?


I HAVE been tracking down photos of city halls to imagine what the architecture of the story setting would be like. To engage with the details, I have been making miniature green ballpoint pen sketches. By now, the buildings are all beginning to look alike.

*

Fortunately the habit of researching essays for university has been very helpful, amongst other things in introducing me to the delights of G***le Books. But Wikipedia and Encyclopaedia Britannica have been very helpful in sketching the outlines of the world I want to explore, and in showing me where research in further depth is needed.

Saturday, July 26, 2014

Abridging the French Revolution of Carlyle

After diving through old draft posts again, I have found this, which is slightly revised. I hope it isn't boring, but since no other blog posts seem to be forthcoming . . . perhaps a little laxity in the pursuit of thrills is permissible.

***

To leaf through to a fresher chapter in my historical research I've decided to read Thomas Carlyle's French Revolution in its entirety. The thing is that, whether it's rational or not, I rarely read more than a page or two of Carlyle at a time because his style of language and of historiography inspire irresistible antipathy.

So, to inspire me to keep on reading, and (ideally) to depict the pre-Revolutionary France and its actors in a fairer and kinder manner, I've tried rewriting the first chapter.

The result hopefully still emphasizes Carlyle's virtues, whilst keeping away the wildest fantasies, softening his prejudices, and simplifying his sentence structures.

Here is a paragraph from the Project Gutenberg text.
These, and what holds of these may pray,—to Beelzebub, or whoever will hear them. But from the rest of France there comes, as was said, no prayer; or one of an opposite character, 'expressed openly in the streets.' Chateau or Hotel, were an enlightened Philosophism scrutinises many things, is not given to prayer: neither are Rossbach victories, Terray Finances, nor, say only 'sixty thousand Lettres de Cachet' (which is Maupeou's share), persuasives towards that. O Henault! Prayers? From a France smitten (by black-art) with plague after plague, and lying now in shame and pain, with a Harlot's foot on its neck, what prayer can come? Those lank scarecrows, that prowl hunger-stricken through all highways and byways of French Existence, will they pray? The dull millions that, in the workshop or furrowfield, grind fore-done at the wheel of Labour, like haltered gin-horses, if blind so much the quieter? Or they that in the Bicetre Hospital, 'eight to a bed,' lie waiting their manumission? Dim are those heads of theirs, dull stagnant those hearts: to them the great Sovereign is known mainly as the great Regrater of Bread. If they hear of his sickness, they will answer with a dull Tant pis pour lui; or with the question, Will he die?
I don't like, for instance, insulting an 'underclass' — even from a sympathetic standpoint — by painting them as an indistinguishable horde of incurious lackwits.

This is the paragraph after I changed it:

"These and their supporters may well pray out of self-interest. But from the rest of France there comes, as has been said, little or no prayer — at least not favourable prayer. The Château or Hotel, given its practice of what one might term enlightened Philosophism, is not given to orisons; nor are the policies of the king’s circle, among them the 'sixty thousand Lettres de Cachet' which fall to Maupeou's share, likely to persuade one to make an exception. To return to Hénault’s words it is indeed questionable from where these pleas should emanate. France is smitten with plague after plague, its rulers suspected of sorcery and ignoble subjection to the will of a courtesan. Why should the starving men who roam through the highways and byways, the millions who labour in the workshop or furrowfield, or those who lie 'eight to a bed' in the Bicêtre Hospital pray? Their minds and feelings are occupied by other matters."

Whether this revision is fine or not, it still dilutes my ire whilst I am reading The French Revolution.

***

Addendum: I haven't read anything of Carlyle's in years — since 2010 when I wrote this, possibly; so it can't have improved my patience too much.

Sunday, June 15, 2014

French Coq, Argentinian Sun, Swiss Red

I might fact-check this blog post again; until then, grain of salt etc.

At the risk of flooding the blog with tales of soccer, yesterday was a fine day of it, and insofar as I can after having taken long breaks during the games to do things quite unrelated to soccer, I wish to ramble a little.

SWITZERLAND vs. ECUADOR was the first game of the day, and was started at 2 p.m. local time* in Brasilia.

THE sun literally cast an eye of heaven through the stadium roof, an ellipsis of light that submerged the Ecuadorean goal (later the Swiss goal) and transfigured that half of the field, and climbing up the mountainous ranks of the audience toward the northward roof. In the later stages of the game, a lighter lattice of shadowy rim formed around the eye of light, illumining the skeleton of the edifice a little. I had hoped that the shade would fling itself across the field by halftime, but instead the sunlight ran in a circular path and never wholly left.

It was difficult to tell if the temperature was great, and whether Switzerland and Ecuador had trained equally to get along with it. (There was a tedious stretch of passing back and forth amongst the Swiss defense, but it might have been intended to maximize the quantity of ball ownership, or to lull the Ecuadorians into apathy, rather than an attempt to prevent physical exertion.) There were anecdotes of other Northern Hemisphere teams taking e.g. to the practice terrain in Portugal with winter clothing to emulate the warmth and humidity of Brazil; evidently it depends on the city, since Rio de Janeiro was around 20° for the Argentina-Bosnia game if I remember correctly, while Manaus was 30° even in the evening and stuffier as the air gathered moisture with the declining sunlight.

I wasn't quite sure for whom to cheer. Both teams were quite proficient, and after looking at the statistics the length of time they held the ball, the number of attempts at a goal, etc. were fairly alike. It was an active and highly physical game that was influenced (apparently) by American football, since the teams were clearly fond of hurling the full lengths of their heights against their foes, when these were toeing the ball, in order to tip the player off his feet and free the ball for a teammate. Even this exercise, carried out without any notable attempt to injure, was a relief after the Thanksgiving-like harvest of yellow cards, relinquishment of ball ownership, etc., in many games for attempts at tripping the enemy.

The winner, of course, was Switzerland, in a lovely dramatic juncture at the 90+3 minute mark.

* Or so I gather from my calculations of each Summer Time, which appears to fall in winter in the Southern Hemisphere within the Distrito Federal at UTC-2, whereas Germany's is at UTC+2, and the game aired at 6 p.m. Berlin time.

Guardian's minute-by-minute report: link.